View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It carries no legal weight in the case of forum discussions, which are copyrighted to the individual posters.
Beyond which, you'd never win a copyright case that involved no profit
for the user and no lost revenues for the "copyright" holder. This is
clearly a case of fair use.
But you're right, you are under no obligation to provide him access to the forum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twelvetrombones Posts-Too-Much
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 1518 Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Evermind wrote: | That also seems to apply to about 90% of all phD theses being written on this planet, which say a lot but discover very little. |
In electrical engineering this is typically done for a variety of
reasons: one could be that one's research involved buidling, testing,
modifying, or often simply maintaining a certain instrument, and the
advisor insists that, since usually no documentation of any sort is
ever given to the poor chap who's gonna use/maintain the instrument
next, the dissertation be a document that can be used as a reference.
Or maybe one would just want to pummel their committee into
submission by giving them a 250-page dissertation draft, to be read in
4 days, in time for the defense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear Site Overlords & Vengeful Gods
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5473 Location: Utopia
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The
really sad part is that after, what, five years, these poor kids insist
there should be some rivalry between the sites, when I really couldn't
care less. One would think that the other parties would have matured a
little over time.
The bait n switch thing was where SRP posted a specific price for an
item. A forum member emailed him about it, to discover that the CD was
going to be part of a private auction with the going rate being far
higher than the listed price. Bait n switch essentially is a tactic to
get someone interested with a misleading ad and then suckering them
into paying more. It's unethical and something that's just not going to
happen on my forum.
Moreover, no one posting trade lists is going to discriminate against
any SSMT forum member for any reason whatsoever. If someone happens to
be a bad trader or a rip off, that's an entirely different case and I
would remove that member. But otherwise, no one will post a trade or
sale list and then pick and choose customers. I do not provide webspace
for elitists and those who wish to discriminate for any reason.
Don't feel like selling to Rog? Then don't post here. Same with any other user.
John _________________
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The
really sad part is that after, what, five years, these poor kids insist
there should be some rivalry between the sites, when I really couldn't
care less. One would think that the other parties would have matured a
little over time. |
I dunno man, making fake legal threats over someone archiving a bulletin board thread seems a little less than mature from where I'm sitting... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear Site Overlords & Vengeful Gods
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5473 Location: Utopia
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie wrote: | Quote: | The
really sad part is that after, what, five years, these poor kids insist
there should be some rivalry between the sites, when I really couldn't
care less. One would think that the other parties would have matured a
little over time. |
I dunno man, making fake legal threats over someone archiving a bulletin board thread seems a little less than mature from where I'm sitting... |
Then post elsewhere. You actually make my point well. It doesn't matter
if "copyright" belongs to this site or the individual posters. SRP
*cannot* wholesale copy another site's contents without permission from
either the site owner or the individuals who posted to the thread in
question. In fact, if each individual holds the copyright, then he
would be required to obtain WRITTEN permission from each person before
he reproduces anything. Moreover, since he's ALSO stealing design AND
phpBB's code without accepting license agreement with them, we have
that to contend with.
Someone who posted on the thread he stole expressed discomfort at
him using his/her words. Finally, "fair use" refers to EXCERPTS from
another work, not wholesale reproduction.
Don't like it? Then get the hell out of this forum and don't bother me again.
John _________________
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Evermind Sir/Madame Post-a-Lot
Joined: 14 Jan 2003 Posts: 709 Location: oil rig!
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rogthefrog wrote: | Evermind wrote: | Only
certain perennial truths are worth pursuing, the rest is aimless vanity
of those who think that everything is as valuable as everything else. |
What about those of us who identify an unresolved issue and want to
understand it better? They spend a few years, write 400 pages, and gain
a pretty good understanding of a particular issue. Nobody else needs to
care, and there's no lofty ideal of contributing to human knowledge.
Just personal intellectual curiosity. |
"I am fine with this interpretation of "value" according to your
worldview, and I can see where you're coming from. But I must also say
that for a large number of people who share my worldview, all this
stuff is essentially useless. " |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He
hasn't reproduced the site. IT'S A LINK TO THE THREAD IN QUESTION.
You're threatening legal action over what amounts to a link to your
website and then you have the gall to accuse others of not being mature?
Last edited by Laeth MacLaurie on Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rogthefrog Posts-Too-Much
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 2038 Location: Fokof
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it was a link it would look like
<a href="whatever">Look how lame the SSMTers are</a>
But it doesn't. It's a full-page copy of an SSMT forum page. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear Site Overlords & Vengeful Gods
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5473 Location: Utopia
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie wrote: | He hasn't reproduced the site. It's a link to the thread in question. |
You have NO clue what you're talking about. That thread does NOT exist
on this site any longer. He reproduced it fully on his site. You really
need to know what the hell you're talking about.
John _________________
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rogthefrog wrote: | If it was a link it would look like
<a href="whatever">Look how lame the SSMTers are</a>
But it doesn't. It's a full-page copy of an SSMT forum page. |
If it wasn't a link, you wouldn't be able to access the SSMT forums
from the page, which you can. All he's done is linked to the webarchive
page for this site, which is hardly copyright violation.
Last edited by Laeth MacLaurie on Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stretch Sir/Madame Post-a-Lot
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 591 Location: The Wide and Lonely Plains of Texas
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Web Images Groups News Froogle LocalNew! more »
Advanced Search
Preferences
Web
Tip: Try removing quotes from your search to get more results.
Your search - "Shaun Goldstein" Ph.D. - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Try different keywords.
- Try more general keywords.
- Try fewer keywords.
Also, you can try Google Answers for expert help with your search. _________________ "(T)he semicolon, if used at all, is a spasmodic ornament rather than a help to the understanding."
-- Le Baron Russell Briggs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear Site Overlords & Vengeful Gods
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5473 Location: Utopia
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie wrote: | rogthefrog wrote: | If it was a link it would look like
<a href="whatever">Look how lame the SSMTers are</a>
But it doesn't. It's a full-page copy of an SSMT forum page. |
If it wasn't a link, you wouldn't be able to access the SSMT forums from the page, which you can. |
It'd be awfully hard to link to something that no longer exists on this site.
Get a clue. He stole from this site. Quit being such a mealy mouthed syncophant.
John _________________
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear wrote: | Laeth MacLaurie wrote: | rogthefrog wrote: | If it was a link it would look like
<a href="whatever">Look how lame the SSMTers are</a>
But it doesn't. It's a full-page copy of an SSMT forum page. |
If it wasn't a link, you wouldn't be able to access the SSMT forums from the page, which you can. |
It'd be awfully hard to link to something that no longer exists on this site.
Get a clue. He stole from this site. Quit being such a mealy mouthed syncophant.
John |
As I said, it's a link to a web archive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear Site Overlords & Vengeful Gods
Joined: 12 Jan 2003 Posts: 5473 Location: Utopia
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I
noticed you aren't even going to touch the fact that he violated
copyrights and moreover, the wishes of those who participated in the
thread.
You, sir, are nothing more than apologist for the twit.
John _________________
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rogthefrog Posts-Too-Much
Joined: 09 Jul 2004 Posts: 2038 Location: Fokof
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Satan Stole My Teddybear wrote: | Laeth MacLaurie wrote: | rogthefrog wrote: | If it was a link it would look like
<a href="whatever">Look how lame the SSMTers are</a>
But it doesn't. It's a full-page copy of an SSMT forum page. |
If it wasn't a link, you wouldn't be able to access the SSMT forums from the page, which you can. |
It'd be awfully hard to link to something that no longer exists on this site.
Get a clue. He stole from this site. Quit being such a mealy mouthed syncophant.
John |
John -> <- ppl who can spel "sickoffant" _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laeth MacLaurie Bunny punk
Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Posts: 71
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Fair
use allows limited uses of another's work without approval, but other
uses may be approved by implication. For example, when a message is
posted to a public email list, both forwarding and archiving seem to be
impliedly allowed. It is reasonable to assume that such liberties are
okay if not explicitly forbidden. However, when forwarding, archiving
or, say, using part of a prior message to respond to an earlier
message, be careful not to change the original meaning. No one
impliedly authorizes another to attribute to them an embarrassing (or
worse) message they did not write!
One web site confidently asserts that all list owners must approve
before email can be forwarded. Yet, absent rules governing particular
lists, I am aware of no legal basis for it. Why would the power of
approval be implicitly given to list owners? Beyond that, few who post
to public lists would object if their messages are forwarded to others
apt to be interested.
In the same vein, it seems that few authors would object to having
messages archived. That serves the interests of list members who may
want to revisit topics addressed earlier. Indeed, most would prefer
archives to seeing old topics rehashed -- why one often sees lists of
frequently asked questions (FAQs), with answers.
Can people revoke implied permission once granted? Circumstances
allowing that seem rare. Courts are, at best, reluctant to allow
someone to impose a difficult burden on others. Email authors should be
careful. Inadvertent messages could be removed from archives, but list
owners -- particularly if they are not paid to maintain the list -- may
have other things to do than correct members' mistakes. Worse, it may
well be impossible to recall inadvertent postings after distribution. |
And
Quote: | Private lists.
"Private" lists are possible. All who sign up might expressedly agree,
say, not to forward list messages. Also, list messages could be
archived anonymously, if at all, or access could be limited by use of
passwords.
Private lists should have few "fair use" problems; permission to
use others' posts should be limited mostly by what they agreed to when
joining, not by copyright law. |
Source: http://www.fplc.edu/tfield/copynet.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongtin Bunny punk
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Mar Sun 06, 2005 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John, that form of citation is protected under fair use.
Is there some reason you deactivated my previous account?
Also, there was no bait and switch: I listed several hundred items, and
some were auctioned both on eBay and privately. This affected a handful
of items out of hundreds. 'Bait and switch' implies intent to deceive.
Second, regarding Rog, I only knew I didn't want to sell to him after I saw this wonderfully mature post:
http://www.ssmt-reviews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4101
I refuse to sell to people who act like enemies; as I explained to him, it wasn't and isn't personal.
You have failed to produce the evidence you had in mind, or proof
that I have broken the law. Further, I think you should see this post
before you draw erroneous conclusions about my intent:
http://bbs.anus.com/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=003303
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|