Patriotic displays are limited to sports, especially in England, where flying the flag of St George is considered racially aggressive by many who favour so-called “multiculturalism”.

Collectively we struggle to understand the place of the United Kingdom in this world. Some see the influence of the West (and implicitly the United Kingdom) over the other parts of the World as a good thing. The British government bring mass media and massive amounts of money to countries that have almost nothing. Mass media exercises its main right: freedom of the press, thus liberating backwater countries that struggle under an oppressive regime.

That's what we would be saying if we believed Western influence to be a good thing. Before the United Kingdom can instruct others about how to live, the citizens of the United Kingdom must under go a re-evaluation of our values. Currently, the country is split with no common set of values. The biggest voices are unfortunately proposing a set of values that pity weak people and encourages weak people to gain power. The weak are subordinates that adhere to Slave morality as proscribed by Nietzsche; aptly summed up by "killing is wrong."

Whereas master morality can be seen allegorically as a wolf hunting for food "that sheep looks tasty", the wolf eats in order to stay alive. This is active and creative contrary to slave morality which is passive and defensive. The main impetus of life for a slave is to alleviate suffering, hence this set of values is popular. No one wants to suffer but everyone wants the reward, the glories, the accolades. The slaves settle for being passive and trying to suffer as little as possible yet never leave the shell of their miniscule world. Transcending to master morality requires risk and struggle, inevitably this will incur suffering. The end result will ensure us that suffering was worthwhile. Pleasure shall be deferred but it shall finally arrive in a far greater amount. The people of the World cannot afford to be passive and struggle through life until death.

Civilisation breeds increasing numbers of passive people. It also breeds aggressive and violent people who are, like the passive, without any noble vision. In any society, the heroic and those with leadership qualities are always of a minority and it has long been observed that the brave are more prone to die without passing their genes on in sufficient numbers to maintain their characteristics in the gene pool. The least intelligent and least courageous proliferate over time - and only a return to the rigours of natural selection (or a eugenic process) can halt this slide.

Wealth - Class / Caste

Quite simply put: money is can not be our rasion d'etre. This is not a meritocracy, people are currently valued by their wealth and not their ability to think. The ability to think does not require one to be an intellectual but requires one to be wise while having a survival instinct. This is a failing of our class society.

Identity

While re-evaluating our values we must first consider what it means to be British. There needs to be something that binds the people together with an identity, a sense of belonging and security. Holding a British passport is not enough to ensure a British community that works towards a common set of goals. British people must speak the same language and hold values that are conducive to positive (active) growth. They must have ancestry predominantly from Britain, and a first loyalty to this country rather than any country outside of Britain. This can be realised by considering what the inhabitants have in common.

At some point in the past your ancestors have had to avoid the black death, numerous wars, famine and fire. Such struggles helped at the time to weed out those that are incapable of survival. These struggles bind a tribe (in general a nation) to a common past. Through the fortitude of your ancestors and most recently the fortitude your parents have you been able to live. This is worthy of celebration. Without their struggles and instinct for survival you would not be here.

In previous epochs of time, it can be guaranteed that your ancestors held a relationship with the land. Whether they were farmers or fishermen, they had to know how to work the land in order to get the best results. This forced a respect of the land upon the people. Such knowledge was passed from generation to generation. The people were bound to the land and survived by knowing their patch as best they could and gave it the due respect. This binds a tribe to a particular area of land. It may have been necessary to move to land that was more fertile or away from a natural disaster. Another struggle but it is part of nature's mechanism. In this new area of land, a new relationship must be made.

As expected building up the relationship and respect will take time.
The national character of the Brits is full of a strength that is a result of the waves of warrior invaders who have settled here. The Empire would not have been possible without the genetic qualities inherited as a consequence of this. How different the people would be as a result of being flooded by waves of defeated refugees seeking a haven from their suffering.

British people of broadly Germanic descent (Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, Nordic and to a lesser degree those of non-Germanic but Roman descent) have had to endure common struggles since the founding of tribes on the land that we now call the United Kingdom. The same is true for the Indian tribes in India, except the Indians have been in India far longer. Those that understand the concept of binding a tribe to a land will respect the land and respect another tribe's need to live. From this we must understand that those of non-Germanic and non-Romano-British descent cannot be bound to the British identity.

This does not implicate violent action against non-Germanic people, nor does it implicate being Germanic is superior to other tribes. This is merely a statement of what it is means to be British. However, it must be noted that not all British people are worthy of life and thus some British people are superfluous to creating a stable and functioning community. Again, we must consider a re-evaluation of values. The articles on this site are of more relevance to British people as defined previously in this document.

Cheap labour is killing us

The importance of monetary wealth in the UK has led to the need for cheap labour, preferably as cheap as possible. The current status quo prefers quantity not quality. Hence, importing cheap labour from poor countries is a ‘good’ idea under our current system. This is noticeable from the recent influx of Polish immigrants. They might be well-mannered, generally respectful to the resident population and work for next nothing but at what overall cost to our country?

They displace our current working class from employment. The working class may (speaking generally) be less well-mannered and less respectful than the Polish immigrants. Without jobs they have even less money than they had with a job. Hence, encouraging them to collect benefits or otherwise steal. Depriving them of a job will not encourage them to work harder for less money. Another folly of the wealth driven society. This is far from ideal but they will exist whether or not Polish people immigrate to the UK. They need employment priority over any immigrant in order to ensure they are self-sufficient.

Having immigrants in the country increases the materialistic obsessions of the population in a terrible vicious circle. When the society is more homogenous, people will work for its betterment - to help their nation and improve conditions for future generations. When there are too many foreigners in the society this motivation is replaced by the motivation of financial gain and personal enrichment alone. The feeling of having something in common with the others is diminished until it can only apply to one‘s immediate family - and even that is compromised. This phenomenon is explainable in terms of kinship recognition, the Selfish Gene concept of Professor Richard Dawkins, and the equation upon which altruistic behaviour has been shown to depend upon relatedness and consequential benefit to one’s genetics by acting altruistically : rb-c>0
Hamilton’s rule

Education is also necessary to help reform the lower classes. Strictly I’m using lower class to mean those people with less money. Someone from the lower classes can still be part of a high level in a caste society. Wealth should not be important. The workers must respect the land and the people, it forms a necessary cornerstone of British society.